The Citizens for Quality Education would like to thank the voters of the St. Helena Unified School District for appreciating the issues currently facing our schools and recognizing the immediate need for a change in the way our school district is operated.
We would also like to thank the replacement candidates for their willingness to step up and make the commitment to help bring positive change to our school district. We look forward to seeing the St. Helena Unified School District and our community move forward together to make our schools even stronger.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Monday, February 15, 2010
Enriching Programs Gone From Our Schools
By Julie Eastman and Joanne Yates
Napa Valley Register, February 15, 2010
We agree with the Register’s editorial that “Students must be top priority in St. Helena” (Jan. 24). Some history might help your readers understand that students have always been the recall’s first priority. Supporters want to provide all students an opportunity to succeed regardless of scholastic ability. It is the same attitude that has been an integral part of wine-growing culture of this valley.
Back in the 1970s, for example, vintner Jack Schulz faced near disaster his first year. In the middle of harvest, his crusher broke down. But, within hours, Beringer Vineyards (courtesy of the Raymond brothers) hauled over what he needed. They saved Napa Creek’s first vintage.
It would have been just as easy to ignore Jack’s troubles, chalking up his problems to inexperience or bad luck. After all, what difference would one less winery make? Lucky for Jack, and all who worked for him, that was not how most of the wine industry greats thought.
Saving Jack’s first year meant experience for a winemaker who later made wines with the legendary Al Brounstein. The winery gave work to designers and printers, brought people to the valley for holiday festivities and became a valuable part of the community.
Jack’s experience represents a tradition of generosity and cooperation that also influenced how we raised and educated our children. Like winery stories, there are school experiences that bear repeating because they too are testimony to our community’s greater spirit.
In 2001, Carol Geyer helped Cory Roche create a project for the special education high school students — making dog cookies. Micki Voisard, a leading animal nutritionist, joined in the effort and, after batches of hard-as-a-rock bone shapes or mushy blobs, the students developed a recipe: a perfect recipe. They shopped for ingredients, baked, weighed, packaged and sold their goods at local stores and at the Farmer’s Market.
Wine Country Cases donated wooden display boxes. St. Helena Olive Oil Company housed a professional oven for students to use. With Gayle Davies’ guidance, students started an organic garden for some of their ingredients. Mike Snowden’s shop students made 11 raised beds; Whiting donated organic soil.
As the project grew, so did the skills and confidence of the students. With the community, Mr. Roche developed a project that seamlessly integrated students into life-learning activities in and out of school. That was exactly what should happen in special ed classrooms, and it cost the school nothing beyond salaries: sales paid for supplies, classroom trips and materials as well.
That same community involvement was instrumental in making Madrone Continuation School, Work Experience and a host of vocational classes practical and meaningful for a range of students. Madrone had a 40-year history in St. Helena based on helping our community’s struggling students. By staying on campus, but in an atmosphere better suited to their needs, the majority of these students graduated.
Work Experience enabled students to gain high school credit by working with community business members. The program was not only about learning skills, but helping students understand their own goals and talents as well.
These classes and programs did not impoverish St. Helena’s schools or keep students from going to college. They made the schools and our community richer by giving everyone an opportunity to be successful and to participate in that success — just as the Raymonds did for Jack Schulz.
Yet in the last several years, these programs have disappeared, not for lack of money, but for a change in priorities that has favored all-time high administrative salaries and staff, unnecessary legal actions against the Napa County Unified School District and St. Helena parents, extravagant retirement packages and an arrogant disregard for the needs of the district’s entire student body.
(Eastman was St. Helena Unified School District’s Certificated Employee of the Year in 2004, and now works for Napa Valley Unified School District. Yates is a former substitute teacher and volunteer in Napa and St. Helena.)
Napa Valley Register, February 15, 2010
We agree with the Register’s editorial that “Students must be top priority in St. Helena” (Jan. 24). Some history might help your readers understand that students have always been the recall’s first priority. Supporters want to provide all students an opportunity to succeed regardless of scholastic ability. It is the same attitude that has been an integral part of wine-growing culture of this valley.
Back in the 1970s, for example, vintner Jack Schulz faced near disaster his first year. In the middle of harvest, his crusher broke down. But, within hours, Beringer Vineyards (courtesy of the Raymond brothers) hauled over what he needed. They saved Napa Creek’s first vintage.
It would have been just as easy to ignore Jack’s troubles, chalking up his problems to inexperience or bad luck. After all, what difference would one less winery make? Lucky for Jack, and all who worked for him, that was not how most of the wine industry greats thought.
Saving Jack’s first year meant experience for a winemaker who later made wines with the legendary Al Brounstein. The winery gave work to designers and printers, brought people to the valley for holiday festivities and became a valuable part of the community.
Jack’s experience represents a tradition of generosity and cooperation that also influenced how we raised and educated our children. Like winery stories, there are school experiences that bear repeating because they too are testimony to our community’s greater spirit.
In 2001, Carol Geyer helped Cory Roche create a project for the special education high school students — making dog cookies. Micki Voisard, a leading animal nutritionist, joined in the effort and, after batches of hard-as-a-rock bone shapes or mushy blobs, the students developed a recipe: a perfect recipe. They shopped for ingredients, baked, weighed, packaged and sold their goods at local stores and at the Farmer’s Market.
Wine Country Cases donated wooden display boxes. St. Helena Olive Oil Company housed a professional oven for students to use. With Gayle Davies’ guidance, students started an organic garden for some of their ingredients. Mike Snowden’s shop students made 11 raised beds; Whiting donated organic soil.
As the project grew, so did the skills and confidence of the students. With the community, Mr. Roche developed a project that seamlessly integrated students into life-learning activities in and out of school. That was exactly what should happen in special ed classrooms, and it cost the school nothing beyond salaries: sales paid for supplies, classroom trips and materials as well.
That same community involvement was instrumental in making Madrone Continuation School, Work Experience and a host of vocational classes practical and meaningful for a range of students. Madrone had a 40-year history in St. Helena based on helping our community’s struggling students. By staying on campus, but in an atmosphere better suited to their needs, the majority of these students graduated.
Work Experience enabled students to gain high school credit by working with community business members. The program was not only about learning skills, but helping students understand their own goals and talents as well.
These classes and programs did not impoverish St. Helena’s schools or keep students from going to college. They made the schools and our community richer by giving everyone an opportunity to be successful and to participate in that success — just as the Raymonds did for Jack Schulz.
Yet in the last several years, these programs have disappeared, not for lack of money, but for a change in priorities that has favored all-time high administrative salaries and staff, unnecessary legal actions against the Napa County Unified School District and St. Helena parents, extravagant retirement packages and an arrogant disregard for the needs of the district’s entire student body.
(Eastman was St. Helena Unified School District’s Certificated Employee of the Year in 2004, and now works for Napa Valley Unified School District. Yates is a former substitute teacher and volunteer in Napa and St. Helena.)
Thursday, February 11, 2010
A Viewpoint From Don Martin, Former Asst Superintendent for SHUSD
As the deadline for voting on the recall of the current St. Helena School Board approaches, it continues to bother me that the current Board takes responsibility for many of the programs and achievements that were begun, and in many instances, completed by the previous Board and administration.
The development of grade level standards and adherence to California State Standards which have led to higher scores on Ca. performance tests were begun under the leadership of Ms. Santangelo and a previous Board of Trustees.
Many of the outreach programs, seeking to assist underperforming students were initiated by the previous Board of Trustees, including the hiring of an Hispanic Outreach Coordinator.
During the tenure of Gina Santangelo, the establishment of a District and school level ELACs were created (English Language Acquisition Committee).
The AVID program, which is a proven program of assistance to underperforming students was brought to the district prior to the current Board’s tenure.
Certain Board members have taken credit for the joint usage agreement and subsequent building of the Boys & Girls Club on the St. Helena Elementary School campus. This partnership was begun by Supt. Gina Santangelo and her leadership provided the impetus to see the project through to completion.
The improved track at RLS was a project begun under Supt. Santangelo and a different Board.
In regard to monies spent over recent years:
One of the current Board of Trustees’ reasons for appointing the current Superintendent is stated as being for the purpose of continuity in leadership for the International Baccalaureate Program. This program was adopted by the Board, and any competent superintendent can implement the program. I have researched IB for several school districts in the past, and there are several critical questions that should be asked regarding the program: How many students are actually graduating with the IB diploma? (in districts I have previewed, the percentage is usually under 5% of the graduating class.) How many colleges recognize the IB diploma? (unless things have changed recently, the UC system does not recognize the program—they do accept Advanced Placement credit.) How much district money is spent on administrators and teachers attending conferences, and where are these conferences held? (historically, the IB conferences are held in Europe, Canada, the East Coast and Caribbean Islands—is this where the district should be spending money?) The bottom line for the IB program is to question how many students are really being helped through the program, and at what cost.
The current Board has incurred tremendous attorney fees in the battle with the county over property tax revenue from students matriculating from Howell Mtn and Pope Valley Elementary Districts. As of this date, this lawsuit, which has cost the district hundreds of thousands of dollars, is being considered a frivolous lawsuit!
Although the retirement package for the outgoing superintendent is probably not illegal in a strict interpretation of state law, is it ethical to take that additional money at a time when the state is continuing to cut educational spending?
If some people question my credibility, I can provide a resume summarizing my 38 years in public education, 4 years of which were spent as the Assistant Superintendent of St. Helena Unified School District, before becoming a superintendent in another district in Northern California.
Respectfully,
Don Martin
The development of grade level standards and adherence to California State Standards which have led to higher scores on Ca. performance tests were begun under the leadership of Ms. Santangelo and a previous Board of Trustees.
Many of the outreach programs, seeking to assist underperforming students were initiated by the previous Board of Trustees, including the hiring of an Hispanic Outreach Coordinator.
During the tenure of Gina Santangelo, the establishment of a District and school level ELACs were created (English Language Acquisition Committee).
The AVID program, which is a proven program of assistance to underperforming students was brought to the district prior to the current Board’s tenure.
Certain Board members have taken credit for the joint usage agreement and subsequent building of the Boys & Girls Club on the St. Helena Elementary School campus. This partnership was begun by Supt. Gina Santangelo and her leadership provided the impetus to see the project through to completion.
The improved track at RLS was a project begun under Supt. Santangelo and a different Board.
In regard to monies spent over recent years:
One of the current Board of Trustees’ reasons for appointing the current Superintendent is stated as being for the purpose of continuity in leadership for the International Baccalaureate Program. This program was adopted by the Board, and any competent superintendent can implement the program. I have researched IB for several school districts in the past, and there are several critical questions that should be asked regarding the program: How many students are actually graduating with the IB diploma? (in districts I have previewed, the percentage is usually under 5% of the graduating class.) How many colleges recognize the IB diploma? (unless things have changed recently, the UC system does not recognize the program—they do accept Advanced Placement credit.) How much district money is spent on administrators and teachers attending conferences, and where are these conferences held? (historically, the IB conferences are held in Europe, Canada, the East Coast and Caribbean Islands—is this where the district should be spending money?) The bottom line for the IB program is to question how many students are really being helped through the program, and at what cost.
The current Board has incurred tremendous attorney fees in the battle with the county over property tax revenue from students matriculating from Howell Mtn and Pope Valley Elementary Districts. As of this date, this lawsuit, which has cost the district hundreds of thousands of dollars, is being considered a frivolous lawsuit!
Although the retirement package for the outgoing superintendent is probably not illegal in a strict interpretation of state law, is it ethical to take that additional money at a time when the state is continuing to cut educational spending?
If some people question my credibility, I can provide a resume summarizing my 38 years in public education, 4 years of which were spent as the Assistant Superintendent of St. Helena Unified School District, before becoming a superintendent in another district in Northern California.
Respectfully,
Don Martin
Friday, February 5, 2010
Let Voices Be Heard
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Letter to Editor
St. Helena Star
Editor: The special recall election ballots have been mailed to all St. Helena Unified School District registered voters and I sincerely hope that everyone in our community will vote in this important election. Only with the direction of our community can our district move forward.
As you consider how to vote, I would like to clarify one thing on the cost of this recall election.
Our registrar of voters, John Tuteur, has indicated that the cost of this special recall election will be between $30,000 and $35,000, and no more. The cost of any prior or subsequent elections cannot be attributed to the recall. They were, or are, required for completely separate reasons.
Yes, this is a lot of money, however when this cost is compared to some of the costs from the past school year it comes into perspective.
For instance, it is only one-tenth of the amount of money our district spent on attorneys fees in the past school year and one-tenth of the amount of money our district awarded to two retiring administrators that had worked for our district for only five years and were already going to receive state retirement benefits.
It is also important to realize that the district will have to pay this cost even if you vote “no” on the recall. When over 2,000 residents signed recall petitions this summer mandating a special recall election, they told the district that they thought this cost was a necessary expense to ensure that the voice of the community was heard.
Todd DeVincenzi
St. Helena
Letter to Editor
St. Helena Star
Editor: The special recall election ballots have been mailed to all St. Helena Unified School District registered voters and I sincerely hope that everyone in our community will vote in this important election. Only with the direction of our community can our district move forward.
As you consider how to vote, I would like to clarify one thing on the cost of this recall election.
Our registrar of voters, John Tuteur, has indicated that the cost of this special recall election will be between $30,000 and $35,000, and no more. The cost of any prior or subsequent elections cannot be attributed to the recall. They were, or are, required for completely separate reasons.
Yes, this is a lot of money, however when this cost is compared to some of the costs from the past school year it comes into perspective.
For instance, it is only one-tenth of the amount of money our district spent on attorneys fees in the past school year and one-tenth of the amount of money our district awarded to two retiring administrators that had worked for our district for only five years and were already going to receive state retirement benefits.
It is also important to realize that the district will have to pay this cost even if you vote “no” on the recall. When over 2,000 residents signed recall petitions this summer mandating a special recall election, they told the district that they thought this cost was a necessary expense to ensure that the voice of the community was heard.
Todd DeVincenzi
St. Helena
Recall Candidates Believe Teachers Deserve Better
St. Helena Star
By Jeannie Kerr
Thursday, January 28, 2010
“Teaching is the profession that teaches all other professions.” — Anonymous Author.
This quote sums up in a simple way the incredible responsibility we place on our teachers. Although we all know how important our teachers are, and how grateful we are to them for helping our children learn, we often do not express it enough.
Lately, there has been some unfortunate misinformation circulating in our community regarding the recall effort and the supposed plans that recall candidates may have regarding the teachers of our district if the recall is successful.
It seems there has been some miscommunication on this subject because the current candidates and recall supporters have made a concerted effort to avoid putting the teachers in an awkward position by discussing the recall with them.
We all agree that this recall effort is not about the teachers but about the decisions that our current school board has made. There are some consistent messages that have come out of the recall that we candidates would like to reiterate here.
Recall supporters have consistently maintained that more school funds should be directed toward our teachers and classrooms so that our students will derive the most benefit from our district’s large budget.
Our school district is blessed with some of the most skilled and talented teachers that deserve all of the support that we can give them. They are the direct link between our children and learning; we want them to have all of the necessary tools and incentives to provide the best education they can to all students.
Recall supporters also hope that teachers will feel free to go to the administration and the board and voice any concerns they have regarding our schools and how they operate. Since the teachers are “in the trenches,” they are our best resource to inform us of what is really happening with our students. Their input is crucial to the success of our school district.
I know that my children and other children will be grateful for the opportunities given to them because of the skilled and caring teachers we have here in St. Helena.
It is important for us to all remember that our teachers are the heart and soul to the development and learning of our students.
I speak on behalf of all of the candidates in the upcoming recall election when I say that we have never felt that this current situation was about decreasing resources to teachers, it has always been about change that is necessary to make sure that our teachers have many resources available to them in order to prepare all of our students for the future.
(Jeannie Kerr is running for Trustee Cynthia Lane’s seat in the St. Helena School Board election. She has been involved with the parent groups for the primary/elementary and middle schools and the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation. She has children attending St. Helena Elementary School and RLS Middle School. She also serves on the city’s Parks and Recreation Commission and in 2003 was named St. Helena Chamber of Commerce “citizen of the year” for spearheading the renovation of a playground in Crane Park.)
By Jeannie Kerr
Thursday, January 28, 2010
“Teaching is the profession that teaches all other professions.” — Anonymous Author.
This quote sums up in a simple way the incredible responsibility we place on our teachers. Although we all know how important our teachers are, and how grateful we are to them for helping our children learn, we often do not express it enough.
Lately, there has been some unfortunate misinformation circulating in our community regarding the recall effort and the supposed plans that recall candidates may have regarding the teachers of our district if the recall is successful.
It seems there has been some miscommunication on this subject because the current candidates and recall supporters have made a concerted effort to avoid putting the teachers in an awkward position by discussing the recall with them.
We all agree that this recall effort is not about the teachers but about the decisions that our current school board has made. There are some consistent messages that have come out of the recall that we candidates would like to reiterate here.
Recall supporters have consistently maintained that more school funds should be directed toward our teachers and classrooms so that our students will derive the most benefit from our district’s large budget.
Our school district is blessed with some of the most skilled and talented teachers that deserve all of the support that we can give them. They are the direct link between our children and learning; we want them to have all of the necessary tools and incentives to provide the best education they can to all students.
Recall supporters also hope that teachers will feel free to go to the administration and the board and voice any concerns they have regarding our schools and how they operate. Since the teachers are “in the trenches,” they are our best resource to inform us of what is really happening with our students. Their input is crucial to the success of our school district.
I know that my children and other children will be grateful for the opportunities given to them because of the skilled and caring teachers we have here in St. Helena.
It is important for us to all remember that our teachers are the heart and soul to the development and learning of our students.
I speak on behalf of all of the candidates in the upcoming recall election when I say that we have never felt that this current situation was about decreasing resources to teachers, it has always been about change that is necessary to make sure that our teachers have many resources available to them in order to prepare all of our students for the future.
(Jeannie Kerr is running for Trustee Cynthia Lane’s seat in the St. Helena School Board election. She has been involved with the parent groups for the primary/elementary and middle schools and the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation. She has children attending St. Helena Elementary School and RLS Middle School. She also serves on the city’s Parks and Recreation Commission and in 2003 was named St. Helena Chamber of Commerce “citizen of the year” for spearheading the renovation of a playground in Crane Park.)
Recall Improves Government
St. Helena Star
Thursday, January 28, 2010
During interviews with the Star editorial board earlier this month, each of the four trustees targeted for recall — and each of their proposed replacements — were asked about governance.
Generally speaking, the incumbents tended to pledge more allegiance to the school district administration, while the challengers tended to side more directly with the district’s parents.
Ironically, just six years ago a group of parents were banging down the walls of the previous administration. They tore down those walls, were elected to office and are today targets of a recall movement by parents who want to tear down new walls.
The irony was lost on the incumbents. With few exceptions, the incumbents’ view is that supporting the administration of Allan Gordon and Rob Haley provided many good things for the district, including a new curriculum.
In the process of supporting the administration, however, the board may have lost its connection with parents who also provided many good things for the district, including funding and public support.
The voters of St. Helena Unified have a choice to make in this election. They can keep the status quo and retain trustees who lean to the bureaucracy. Or they can elect new trustees who will lean more toward the parents.
While the four St. Helena school trustees have committed no “high crimes or misdemeanors,” they are facing a jury of their peers for, in essence, ignoring the speed limit.
In May 2009, when the school board announced it would promote Rob Haley as district superintendent without first conducting a candidate search, many of the district’s leading parents and supporters asked the board to slow down the process. Trustees heard the parents, but didn’t listen. Instead, they kept speeding along.
For some parents who were just starting to keep tabs on the board, the decision came as quite a shock. For many more community members the decision was seen as poor governance. That’s why a third of all eligible district voters petitioned to get a recall on the ballot.
Their concerns fell into three basic categories.
• Leadership: The administration, rather than the board, was running the district. Instead, trustees should set policies and the administration should carry them out.
• Communication: The district failed to fully communicate with parents before major projects were approved, before long-term strategic plans were formulated, before special education classes were closed or moved, and before major curriculum changes were adopted.
• Spending: The board was spending too much public money. The district budget has more than doubled in 10 years, while enrollment has dropped 20 percent. Spending money on public relations and retirement incentives did not make sense to parents struggling to raise funds for student programs.
Even after the recall qualified for the ballot, the incumbents still had a chance to embrace the parents. Anyone who has ever been pulled over for speeding knows that a respectful attitude will often convince the traffic cop to let you go with a warning.
But the parents, instead of being validated, were accused of being out of touch and too new to the school district to give advice. Their opinions were deemed irrelevant, even though many of these parents made up the very core of the district’s support network.
The board should have realized that 2,000-plus signatures in favor of a recall election represented more than a few disgruntled parents. Rather, it represented a political movement on a scale similar to the one that replaced the previous administration in 2004.
Instead, the board acted as if they had never been guilty of speeding in the first place. By refusing to slow down, the board was telling the parents they had no right to set the speed limit.
“We listened to them, but we did not comply,” Trustee Cynthia Lane told the Star editorial board. Trustees Ines DeLuna and Carolyn Martini struggled to recall any mistakes made by the board.
To be fair, the incumbents are now sharing more information with the public as a result of the recall election. But it’s too little, too late.
The four challengers — Sean Maher, Jeannie Kerr, Jeanne DeVincenzi, and Jeff Conwell — offer impressive credentials and long records of public service. They each seem eager to listen, communicate and act. They make the point that, now that the school district is threatened with the loss of up to half of its revenue due to state funding cuts, the administration should already be meeting with parents, teachers, staff and trustees to figure out the community’s top priorities.
The challengers make the point that there’s no time to waste — that waiting for the November election to replace trustees will only delay the process of involving the community. They reason that it’s better to get the new trustees up to speed as soon as possible.
If elected, new board members should embrace all ideas when considering how to deal with funding cuts. They should ask tough questions of the administration. They should invest in mediation, not litigation. They should act quickly to mend fences with other school districts.
Although the Star supports the recall in general, there is one fly in this ointment. The new board will need help getting up to speed over the next few months. It might be wise for voters to retain one of the current trustees as a bridge to the future, to make sure all segments of the community are represented.
That holdover trustee should be Cindy Warren, whose term is up in 2012. Of the four incumbents, she is most qualified to act as a community liaison for the new board.
“We absolutely made mistakes in (the) process — we assumed a lot when we saw empty board meetings, (we assumed) they didn’t care,” Warren told the editorial board.
Voters can send a strong message in favor of better governance by recalling incumbent trustees DeLuna, Lane and Martini. They can begin the process of healing the community by retaining Trustee Warren.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
During interviews with the Star editorial board earlier this month, each of the four trustees targeted for recall — and each of their proposed replacements — were asked about governance.
Generally speaking, the incumbents tended to pledge more allegiance to the school district administration, while the challengers tended to side more directly with the district’s parents.
Ironically, just six years ago a group of parents were banging down the walls of the previous administration. They tore down those walls, were elected to office and are today targets of a recall movement by parents who want to tear down new walls.
The irony was lost on the incumbents. With few exceptions, the incumbents’ view is that supporting the administration of Allan Gordon and Rob Haley provided many good things for the district, including a new curriculum.
In the process of supporting the administration, however, the board may have lost its connection with parents who also provided many good things for the district, including funding and public support.
The voters of St. Helena Unified have a choice to make in this election. They can keep the status quo and retain trustees who lean to the bureaucracy. Or they can elect new trustees who will lean more toward the parents.
While the four St. Helena school trustees have committed no “high crimes or misdemeanors,” they are facing a jury of their peers for, in essence, ignoring the speed limit.
In May 2009, when the school board announced it would promote Rob Haley as district superintendent without first conducting a candidate search, many of the district’s leading parents and supporters asked the board to slow down the process. Trustees heard the parents, but didn’t listen. Instead, they kept speeding along.
For some parents who were just starting to keep tabs on the board, the decision came as quite a shock. For many more community members the decision was seen as poor governance. That’s why a third of all eligible district voters petitioned to get a recall on the ballot.
Their concerns fell into three basic categories.
• Leadership: The administration, rather than the board, was running the district. Instead, trustees should set policies and the administration should carry them out.
• Communication: The district failed to fully communicate with parents before major projects were approved, before long-term strategic plans were formulated, before special education classes were closed or moved, and before major curriculum changes were adopted.
• Spending: The board was spending too much public money. The district budget has more than doubled in 10 years, while enrollment has dropped 20 percent. Spending money on public relations and retirement incentives did not make sense to parents struggling to raise funds for student programs.
Even after the recall qualified for the ballot, the incumbents still had a chance to embrace the parents. Anyone who has ever been pulled over for speeding knows that a respectful attitude will often convince the traffic cop to let you go with a warning.
But the parents, instead of being validated, were accused of being out of touch and too new to the school district to give advice. Their opinions were deemed irrelevant, even though many of these parents made up the very core of the district’s support network.
The board should have realized that 2,000-plus signatures in favor of a recall election represented more than a few disgruntled parents. Rather, it represented a political movement on a scale similar to the one that replaced the previous administration in 2004.
Instead, the board acted as if they had never been guilty of speeding in the first place. By refusing to slow down, the board was telling the parents they had no right to set the speed limit.
“We listened to them, but we did not comply,” Trustee Cynthia Lane told the Star editorial board. Trustees Ines DeLuna and Carolyn Martini struggled to recall any mistakes made by the board.
To be fair, the incumbents are now sharing more information with the public as a result of the recall election. But it’s too little, too late.
The four challengers — Sean Maher, Jeannie Kerr, Jeanne DeVincenzi, and Jeff Conwell — offer impressive credentials and long records of public service. They each seem eager to listen, communicate and act. They make the point that, now that the school district is threatened with the loss of up to half of its revenue due to state funding cuts, the administration should already be meeting with parents, teachers, staff and trustees to figure out the community’s top priorities.
The challengers make the point that there’s no time to waste — that waiting for the November election to replace trustees will only delay the process of involving the community. They reason that it’s better to get the new trustees up to speed as soon as possible.
If elected, new board members should embrace all ideas when considering how to deal with funding cuts. They should ask tough questions of the administration. They should invest in mediation, not litigation. They should act quickly to mend fences with other school districts.
Although the Star supports the recall in general, there is one fly in this ointment. The new board will need help getting up to speed over the next few months. It might be wise for voters to retain one of the current trustees as a bridge to the future, to make sure all segments of the community are represented.
That holdover trustee should be Cindy Warren, whose term is up in 2012. Of the four incumbents, she is most qualified to act as a community liaison for the new board.
“We absolutely made mistakes in (the) process — we assumed a lot when we saw empty board meetings, (we assumed) they didn’t care,” Warren told the editorial board.
Voters can send a strong message in favor of better governance by recalling incumbent trustees DeLuna, Lane and Martini. They can begin the process of healing the community by retaining Trustee Warren.
Invest In Preschool-Editorial by Sean Maher
St. Helena Star February 4th
Throughout my campaign as a replacement candidate in the upcoming school board recall election, I have had the opportunity to meet with many members of our community to discuss concerns regarding our school district.
One important issue that has come up time and again is affordable quality preschool. One woman I spoke with informed me that research has indicated approximately 150 local children are currently in need of this service.
Through my discussions with some of the leaders in our Hispanic community, I have learned that during the past several years they have tried to establish an affordable preschool in St. Helena. I have also been told that the St. Helena Unified School District has been approached over the years for help in establishing such a preschool, but nothing has been accomplished so far.
It seems to me that SHUSD is missing a tremendous opportunity here to strengthen our commitment to this segment of our community and to students who have the ability to be successful if provided with the right start.
I truly believe that an affordable quality preschool needs to become a reality for us in St. Helena. Such a program could bring long lasting and far-reaching results for our students, teachers, parents and community as a whole. It is well documented that children who attend preschool:
• Are more proficient at reading at the elementary school level;
• Become more socialized so that they work well with their peers in class;
• Tend to score higher on tests;
• Are less likely to be placed in special education classes or held back a grade;
• Are more likely to graduate from high school and attend college;
• Are higher wage earners; and
• Are less likely to need public assistance as adults.
I have spoken with my fellow replacement candidates regarding this issue and all of them are extremely motivated to try to get this program off the ground and running.
I believe, as do they, that our school district needs to be a part of establishing an effective preschool for those who can’t afford the current private preschool offerings in our community. After all, it is our schools that will reap the benefits of such a program.
We have a tremendous Boys & Girls Club that now averages 189 kids a day. The Teen Center has been completely renovated and membership is increasing. With the exception of affordable preschool, it seems we have our kids in St. Helena well-covered.
What is currently missing is a resource for low-income families whose children are not yet of school age.
Various members of our community continue to work towards a solution, and this effort will depend on the generosity of our community and hard work of concerned citizens. Considering what we know about the benefits of preschool, I believe that now is the time for affordable preschool in St. Helena. Our community can and should work to make this happen.
(Sean P. Maher is running for Ines DeLuna’s seat in the St. Helena School board recall election. As Boys and Girls Club president from 2004 to 2006, he co-chaired the capital campaign that financed the club’s Tainter Street facility. As a founding partner with Maher and Associates, he assists wine-related businesses with long-term planning and asset management. He has coached youth baseball, basketball and soccer.)
Throughout my campaign as a replacement candidate in the upcoming school board recall election, I have had the opportunity to meet with many members of our community to discuss concerns regarding our school district.
One important issue that has come up time and again is affordable quality preschool. One woman I spoke with informed me that research has indicated approximately 150 local children are currently in need of this service.
Through my discussions with some of the leaders in our Hispanic community, I have learned that during the past several years they have tried to establish an affordable preschool in St. Helena. I have also been told that the St. Helena Unified School District has been approached over the years for help in establishing such a preschool, but nothing has been accomplished so far.
It seems to me that SHUSD is missing a tremendous opportunity here to strengthen our commitment to this segment of our community and to students who have the ability to be successful if provided with the right start.
I truly believe that an affordable quality preschool needs to become a reality for us in St. Helena. Such a program could bring long lasting and far-reaching results for our students, teachers, parents and community as a whole. It is well documented that children who attend preschool:
• Are more proficient at reading at the elementary school level;
• Become more socialized so that they work well with their peers in class;
• Tend to score higher on tests;
• Are less likely to be placed in special education classes or held back a grade;
• Are more likely to graduate from high school and attend college;
• Are higher wage earners; and
• Are less likely to need public assistance as adults.
I have spoken with my fellow replacement candidates regarding this issue and all of them are extremely motivated to try to get this program off the ground and running.
I believe, as do they, that our school district needs to be a part of establishing an effective preschool for those who can’t afford the current private preschool offerings in our community. After all, it is our schools that will reap the benefits of such a program.
We have a tremendous Boys & Girls Club that now averages 189 kids a day. The Teen Center has been completely renovated and membership is increasing. With the exception of affordable preschool, it seems we have our kids in St. Helena well-covered.
What is currently missing is a resource for low-income families whose children are not yet of school age.
Various members of our community continue to work towards a solution, and this effort will depend on the generosity of our community and hard work of concerned citizens. Considering what we know about the benefits of preschool, I believe that now is the time for affordable preschool in St. Helena. Our community can and should work to make this happen.
(Sean P. Maher is running for Ines DeLuna’s seat in the St. Helena School board recall election. As Boys and Girls Club president from 2004 to 2006, he co-chaired the capital campaign that financed the club’s Tainter Street facility. As a founding partner with Maher and Associates, he assists wine-related businesses with long-term planning and asset management. He has coached youth baseball, basketball and soccer.)
Monday, January 25, 2010
California Proposed Budget Sheds Light On SHUSD Frivolous Spending
Like most people, I’ve never taken much notice when the governor releases a proposed budget. However, because of fears that our school district may soon be facing tough financial decisions, I decided to take a look at Gov. Schwarzenegger’s proposed budget.
It’s a thought-provoking read. The proposed budget states that, “In an effort to protect classroom funding, the governor is proposing a reduction of approximately 10 percent in funding for administration, overhead and other non-instruction-related spending by school districts. [The governor proposes a] reduction of $1.2 billion targeted to school district central administration. This proposal will protect classroom spending, including spending for teachers and principals, from further reductions.”
So, while the governor proposes that school districts cut back on administrative spending during these tough economic times, the four members of the St. Helena school board who are the subject of a recall election have decided that administrators should be awarded handsome salaries and generous supplemental early retirement packages. Instead of taking a position similar to the governor’s that we need to decrease spending on administration in order to protect classroom spending, these four board members have supported and defended the view that our district needs a lot of administrators and we need to pay them substantially more than other school districts in the state.
This is not only a frivolous approach to school finance, it’s also a very short-sighted one. It’s well known that we have a well-funded school district. However, the director of the Department of Finance for California stated that our state now faces a projected budget deficit of $19.9 billion. How long will it be before the state starts taking a hard look at wealthy districts such as ours to make up for shortfalls in educational funding elsewhere? If that happens, how do these board members think our district will handle severe cuts in our funding? Will they try to take back the large retirement packages or cut back on bloated administrative salaries? Judging from their actions so far, that seems unlikely. This is one of the many reasons why the recall is so necessary.
Kathy Zelazny / St. Helena
It’s a thought-provoking read. The proposed budget states that, “In an effort to protect classroom funding, the governor is proposing a reduction of approximately 10 percent in funding for administration, overhead and other non-instruction-related spending by school districts. [The governor proposes a] reduction of $1.2 billion targeted to school district central administration. This proposal will protect classroom spending, including spending for teachers and principals, from further reductions.”
So, while the governor proposes that school districts cut back on administrative spending during these tough economic times, the four members of the St. Helena school board who are the subject of a recall election have decided that administrators should be awarded handsome salaries and generous supplemental early retirement packages. Instead of taking a position similar to the governor’s that we need to decrease spending on administration in order to protect classroom spending, these four board members have supported and defended the view that our district needs a lot of administrators and we need to pay them substantially more than other school districts in the state.
This is not only a frivolous approach to school finance, it’s also a very short-sighted one. It’s well known that we have a well-funded school district. However, the director of the Department of Finance for California stated that our state now faces a projected budget deficit of $19.9 billion. How long will it be before the state starts taking a hard look at wealthy districts such as ours to make up for shortfalls in educational funding elsewhere? If that happens, how do these board members think our district will handle severe cuts in our funding? Will they try to take back the large retirement packages or cut back on bloated administrative salaries? Judging from their actions so far, that seems unlikely. This is one of the many reasons why the recall is so necessary.
Kathy Zelazny / St. Helena
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
A Note of Thanks
We are truly grateful for the continued support from the community. Our supporter list grows daily and we have ordered more signs since there is a great deal of demand for them! Please email us if we can deliver a sign to you. Again, thank you your support!
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Cadidate's Personal Statement: Jeanne DeVincenzi
My husband and I have lived in St. Helena for 11 years and have three daughters in the school district. I am actively involved in our schools as the President of the Elementary School Site Council, a member of the RLS Site Council, a director of the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation Endowment Trust, a member of the Elementary and Primary Schools Parent Teacher Group, and a member of the District's Strategic Planning Committee.
I am a business attorney and have practiced for 14 years. In my line of work, I help clients identify their priorities and determine practical ways to reach their goals within the boundaries of the law. I help them resolve disputes and understand complex issues.
I will use my professional skills and my experience with our schools to do the following:
· Support our teachers and students;
· Improve communication with parents and the community;
· Oversee legal and financial issues;
· Suggest innovative solutions;
· Provide insight into the unique issues facing our school sites; and
· Track legislative action that impacts our district.
I will act with respect, integrity and honesty.
I will work hard to make sure that we provide the opportunities and resources so that ALL students can reach their full potential.
I am a business attorney and have practiced for 14 years. In my line of work, I help clients identify their priorities and determine practical ways to reach their goals within the boundaries of the law. I help them resolve disputes and understand complex issues.
I will use my professional skills and my experience with our schools to do the following:
· Support our teachers and students;
· Improve communication with parents and the community;
· Oversee legal and financial issues;
· Suggest innovative solutions;
· Provide insight into the unique issues facing our school sites; and
· Track legislative action that impacts our district.
I will act with respect, integrity and honesty.
I will work hard to make sure that we provide the opportunities and resources so that ALL students can reach their full potential.
Candidate's Personal Statement: Sean Maher
My family came to St. Helena more than 34 years ago, and my wife and I now have two children in the school district. I proudly serve our community and kids as past President and continuing Board Member of the St. Helena Boys and Girls Club. As President, I led the fundraising and community relations campaign to build our new clubhouse/gym at the St. Helena Elementary School, working collaboratively with community leaders to make it happen. I am also a regular youth sports volunteer, coaching soccer, basketball, and baseball each year. For the older kids, my family recently completed an extensive renovation of the city-owned Teen Center.
For 15 years I have managed my own business in town, building strong community and client relationships. I look forward to building equally strong and collaborative relationships as a member of the School Board. I commit to an unwavering focus on the success of our students and their teachers. I commit to being fair and honest, soliciting perspective from parents, community members, and the administration. Finally, I commit to an ongoing critical review of the district’s finances and other complex challenges, and to seeking respectful paths towards solutions.
For 15 years I have managed my own business in town, building strong community and client relationships. I look forward to building equally strong and collaborative relationships as a member of the School Board. I commit to an unwavering focus on the success of our students and their teachers. I commit to being fair and honest, soliciting perspective from parents, community members, and the administration. Finally, I commit to an ongoing critical review of the district’s finances and other complex challenges, and to seeking respectful paths towards solutions.
Candidate's Personal Statement: Jeff Conwell
From 1971 – 1978, I was a student in Saint Helena Elementary and RLS. After graduating from Vanderbilt University, I was a pilot for 12 years in the United States Navy. In 1998, I was hired by United Airlines and moved back to Saint Helena.
Our three children attend public schools – RLS, Elementary and Primary. Over the past twelve years, I was on the Primary School Site Council, Napa County Grand Jury and coached multiple sports. I currently led Cub Scout Pack 199, am involved in American Legion Post 199 and on the board for the Napa Valley State Park Association.
This is a wonderful community to raise children, but we can clearly improve the fiscal accountability and openness of our Public School System. As a board member, I will listen to the concerns of the community and openly discuss those inputs prior to making decisions. The Napa County Grand Jury taught me to do through research, ask questions, and hold administrators accountable to the public. We must challenge and demand the administration to provide excellent teachers, facilities, and environment to produce the best students.
The time is right for a change. We need new insightful members on the school board.
Our three children attend public schools – RLS, Elementary and Primary. Over the past twelve years, I was on the Primary School Site Council, Napa County Grand Jury and coached multiple sports. I currently led Cub Scout Pack 199, am involved in American Legion Post 199 and on the board for the Napa Valley State Park Association.
This is a wonderful community to raise children, but we can clearly improve the fiscal accountability and openness of our Public School System. As a board member, I will listen to the concerns of the community and openly discuss those inputs prior to making decisions. The Napa County Grand Jury taught me to do through research, ask questions, and hold administrators accountable to the public. We must challenge and demand the administration to provide excellent teachers, facilities, and environment to produce the best students.
The time is right for a change. We need new insightful members on the school board.
Candidate's Personal Statement: Jeannie Kerr
I believe in public education and that it is the responsibility of the school board, administration, teachers, and parents to ensure that every student receives the opportunities and resources necessary to obtain an excellent education.
I have two children in the public schools. I have served the school community in many different capacities over the last eight years, including Parent Teacher Group President, mini-grants committee member of the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation, member of the District Strategic Planning Team, and committee chair of the Just Imagine Auction. My extensive hands-on school experience enables me to bring a unique prospective of oversight and financial management to school budgeting, ensuring funds are effectively allocated to programs and resources that will benefit all students.
Through my dedication to the schools and community, I have earned the respect of the district’s administration, teachers and parents. I believe that through respectful and thoughtful communication, I can bring these groups and the broader community together so that we can truly focus on supporting our schools, teachers and students during this time of shrinking financial resources.
I would be honored to serve as a member of the St. Helena Unified School District Board of Trustees.
I have two children in the public schools. I have served the school community in many different capacities over the last eight years, including Parent Teacher Group President, mini-grants committee member of the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation, member of the District Strategic Planning Team, and committee chair of the Just Imagine Auction. My extensive hands-on school experience enables me to bring a unique prospective of oversight and financial management to school budgeting, ensuring funds are effectively allocated to programs and resources that will benefit all students.
Through my dedication to the schools and community, I have earned the respect of the district’s administration, teachers and parents. I believe that through respectful and thoughtful communication, I can bring these groups and the broader community together so that we can truly focus on supporting our schools, teachers and students during this time of shrinking financial resources.
I would be honored to serve as a member of the St. Helena Unified School District Board of Trustees.
CANDIDATE PROFILE: Jeff Conwell
By Jesse Duarte
STAFF WRITER
Friday, December 25, 2009
As a member of the Napa County Grand Jury in 2003-2004, Jeff Conwell learned he had a knack for keeping tabs on public officials.
Now he wants a seat on the St. Helena School Board so he can bring that oversight to bear on the local school district.
Conwell is running for Trustee Cindy Warren’s seat in the Feb. 23 recall election. But he stressed that “I don’t view this election as me versus Cindy Warren.”
“This is Cindy Warren running on her past as a boardmember,” he said. “If people vote ‘yes’ on the recall, then I want people to think I’m a worthy replacement who could fill her term.”
Conwell leads a local Cub Scout pack, is involved in the American Legion and serves on the board of the Napa Valley State Parks Association. He spent one year on the Primary School Site Council.
He described himself as “approachable and willing to listen to all points of view.” He said he’d bring a positive attitude to the school board.
The district has strained relationships with some members of the community and a few local agencies, but he would “improve our district’s image by offering a fresh change of perspective and outlook,” he said.
He said that as a trustee he’d draw on his grand jury experience, which taught him to “do the research and read the information so I can ask the questions that need to be asked.”
He also has three children attending St. Helena schools, “so as an active parent I’m very interested in making sure them and their classmates get the best education possible,” he said.
The district benefits from a generous community, skilled teachers and dedicated parents, and reasonably good facilities, notwithstanding some outdated buildings at RLS Middle School, he said.
The main thing that’s holding the district back from greatness is the board, said Conwell.
He cited board by-laws which call for the district to be “responsive to the values, beliefs and priorities of the community.”
Instead, trustees have a “cozy relationship” with each other and with the administration, and they do business in a way that lacks transparency, he said.
“Everything seemed closed-off, and that’s what ignited the recall,” he said.
The classic example was when the board hired then-Assistant Superintendent Robert Haley to replace the retiring Allan Gordon without conducting an open search for other candidates, said Conwell.
“When they announced this at the board meeting and the board did open high-fives in celebration, it really set off this group that charged ahead and asked, ‘What can we do to change this?’” he said.
The recall campaign gathered steam when parents realized that the board had given Gordon and former high school Principal Jim Zoll generous retirement packages, said Conwell.
He said that if he’s elected, he’d push for the board to take a close look at the budget and reconsider the district’s fiscal priorities.
“We’re spending a lot on legal costs, and that’s all money that’s not going into the classroom,” he said.
Conwell, a pilot for United Airlines, is a union member, so he understands employment contracts, he said. Right now the district’s contracts with its employees don’t address what would happen if the district loses its Basic Aid status and faces a steep decline in revenue, he said.
The board needs to make sure that if times get tough, the district’s employees take a fair cut, he said.
Conwell also wants to make sure administrators’ salaries aren’t tied to teachers’ contracts.
“Right now, if the teachers get a big raise, consequently the superintendent does too,” he said. “It doesn’t seem right that the superintendent is negotiating something that they receive a return on.”
Conwell said he likes the International Baccalaureate program overall, particularly the training teachers have undergone. But he’s concerned about “a few hiccups,” such as problems with prerequisite classes at the high school.
“We’ve jumped with both feet into this program and we’re trying to do it on a very aggressive timeline,” he said. “Not everything has worked. We won’t know how successful the IB diploma program is until we’ve had a few graduating classes.”
Conwell said that if he loses this time, he’d “definitely run again."
STAFF WRITER
Friday, December 25, 2009
As a member of the Napa County Grand Jury in 2003-2004, Jeff Conwell learned he had a knack for keeping tabs on public officials.
Now he wants a seat on the St. Helena School Board so he can bring that oversight to bear on the local school district.
Conwell is running for Trustee Cindy Warren’s seat in the Feb. 23 recall election. But he stressed that “I don’t view this election as me versus Cindy Warren.”
“This is Cindy Warren running on her past as a boardmember,” he said. “If people vote ‘yes’ on the recall, then I want people to think I’m a worthy replacement who could fill her term.”
Conwell leads a local Cub Scout pack, is involved in the American Legion and serves on the board of the Napa Valley State Parks Association. He spent one year on the Primary School Site Council.
He described himself as “approachable and willing to listen to all points of view.” He said he’d bring a positive attitude to the school board.
The district has strained relationships with some members of the community and a few local agencies, but he would “improve our district’s image by offering a fresh change of perspective and outlook,” he said.
He said that as a trustee he’d draw on his grand jury experience, which taught him to “do the research and read the information so I can ask the questions that need to be asked.”
He also has three children attending St. Helena schools, “so as an active parent I’m very interested in making sure them and their classmates get the best education possible,” he said.
The district benefits from a generous community, skilled teachers and dedicated parents, and reasonably good facilities, notwithstanding some outdated buildings at RLS Middle School, he said.
The main thing that’s holding the district back from greatness is the board, said Conwell.
He cited board by-laws which call for the district to be “responsive to the values, beliefs and priorities of the community.”
Instead, trustees have a “cozy relationship” with each other and with the administration, and they do business in a way that lacks transparency, he said.
“Everything seemed closed-off, and that’s what ignited the recall,” he said.
The classic example was when the board hired then-Assistant Superintendent Robert Haley to replace the retiring Allan Gordon without conducting an open search for other candidates, said Conwell.
“When they announced this at the board meeting and the board did open high-fives in celebration, it really set off this group that charged ahead and asked, ‘What can we do to change this?’” he said.
The recall campaign gathered steam when parents realized that the board had given Gordon and former high school Principal Jim Zoll generous retirement packages, said Conwell.
He said that if he’s elected, he’d push for the board to take a close look at the budget and reconsider the district’s fiscal priorities.
“We’re spending a lot on legal costs, and that’s all money that’s not going into the classroom,” he said.
Conwell, a pilot for United Airlines, is a union member, so he understands employment contracts, he said. Right now the district’s contracts with its employees don’t address what would happen if the district loses its Basic Aid status and faces a steep decline in revenue, he said.
The board needs to make sure that if times get tough, the district’s employees take a fair cut, he said.
Conwell also wants to make sure administrators’ salaries aren’t tied to teachers’ contracts.
“Right now, if the teachers get a big raise, consequently the superintendent does too,” he said. “It doesn’t seem right that the superintendent is negotiating something that they receive a return on.”
Conwell said he likes the International Baccalaureate program overall, particularly the training teachers have undergone. But he’s concerned about “a few hiccups,” such as problems with prerequisite classes at the high school.
“We’ve jumped with both feet into this program and we’re trying to do it on a very aggressive timeline,” he said. “Not everything has worked. We won’t know how successful the IB diploma program is until we’ve had a few graduating classes.”
Conwell said that if he loses this time, he’d “definitely run again."
CANDIDATE PROFILE: Jeanne DeVincenzi
By Jesse Duarte
STAFF WRITER
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Jeanne DeVincenzi said that as a school boardmember she would work to make sure every St. Helena student gets the same high-quality education her three daughters are enjoying.
“I’m all about positive change,” said DeVincenzi, who’s seeking Trustee Carolyn Martini’s seat in the Feb. 23 recall election.
DeVincenzi, a business attorney, is president of the St. Helena Elementary School Site Council. She serves on the RLS Middle School Site Council and on the board of the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation Endowment Trust. She was previously a member of the Parent Teacher Group for the primary and elementary schools.
DeVincenzi said that while her three daughters are thriving in St. Helena’s public schools system, “it’s heartbreaking to me when I see the children who aren’t.”
She said she’s afraid special education students aren’t getting the education they deserve — not because of a lack of talented teachers, but because of high-level program decisions the district has made.
Students who aren’t college-bound also need more support, she said. The district needs to find a way to keep the International Baccalaureate program in place and still give those kids the tools they need to succeed, she said.
DeVincenzi is worried that at-risk students aren’t being served as well as they were when the Madrone continuation school operated on the high school campus.
She also wants to make sure English language learners are provided with enough resources.
“We need to reach out to the Hispanic community and see what their concerns are,” she said.
DeVincenzi said that in addition to her keen interest in education, her legal knowledge could come in handy when the board deals with contracts and litigation.
“I could read the legal briefs and have a dialogue with the district’s attorneys,” she said.
More communication
A lot of the district’s problems are due to lack of communication, said DeVincenzi.
“When the recall succeeds, I think you will see much better communication,” she said. “The public will be encouraged to speak more, and their comments will be answered.”
Communication will also be more effective because the recall candidates are “incredibly engaged in our schools,” and understand the important issues, said DeVincenzi.
Right now some parents, students and teachers fear retaliation if they speak their minds, she said.
“That culture has to stop, 100 percent,” said DeVincenzi. “We see that problem, acknowledge it, and want to change it.”
“We also need a board that will direct the district rather than allow the superintendent to direct it,” said DeVincenzi. “Superintendents are in charge of day-to-day operations, but they need some direction.”
More oversight
Given the possibility that the state will take away St. Helena’s Basic Aid status — it’s already done away with the name in favor of the ominous term “excess revenue” — the board needs to come up with a plan to do more with less.
That means looking at the district’s financial priorities, said DeVincenzi.
“I’m concerned that there are some programs that are not being funded and there are some segments of our student population that are not being served as well as they could be,” she said. “We need to ask some tough questions about where our dollars should be spent.”
DeVincenzi believes the recall was sparked in April when the board appointed Robert Haley as superintendent, instead of hiring him on an interim basis and conducting an outside search for other candidates.
“That caused a lot of parents and community members to start talking,” said DeVincenzi. “People shared the experiences and concerns that they had, and it seemed that a lot of those stories weren’t isolated experiences — they were part of a pattern.”
The recall could have been avoided if trustees had taken the community’s advice on the Haley appointment, drafted his contract differently, or even explained their position more effectively, said DeVincenzi.
“Time and time again, instead of listening to people’s questions and comments and keeping an open mind, the board has dug in and continued on its path,” she said.
DeVincenzi said that if she doesn’t win Martini’s seat, she would run for one of the three seats that are available in November 2010.
STAFF WRITER
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Jeanne DeVincenzi said that as a school boardmember she would work to make sure every St. Helena student gets the same high-quality education her three daughters are enjoying.
“I’m all about positive change,” said DeVincenzi, who’s seeking Trustee Carolyn Martini’s seat in the Feb. 23 recall election.
DeVincenzi, a business attorney, is president of the St. Helena Elementary School Site Council. She serves on the RLS Middle School Site Council and on the board of the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation Endowment Trust. She was previously a member of the Parent Teacher Group for the primary and elementary schools.
DeVincenzi said that while her three daughters are thriving in St. Helena’s public schools system, “it’s heartbreaking to me when I see the children who aren’t.”
She said she’s afraid special education students aren’t getting the education they deserve — not because of a lack of talented teachers, but because of high-level program decisions the district has made.
Students who aren’t college-bound also need more support, she said. The district needs to find a way to keep the International Baccalaureate program in place and still give those kids the tools they need to succeed, she said.
DeVincenzi is worried that at-risk students aren’t being served as well as they were when the Madrone continuation school operated on the high school campus.
She also wants to make sure English language learners are provided with enough resources.
“We need to reach out to the Hispanic community and see what their concerns are,” she said.
DeVincenzi said that in addition to her keen interest in education, her legal knowledge could come in handy when the board deals with contracts and litigation.
“I could read the legal briefs and have a dialogue with the district’s attorneys,” she said.
More communication
A lot of the district’s problems are due to lack of communication, said DeVincenzi.
“When the recall succeeds, I think you will see much better communication,” she said. “The public will be encouraged to speak more, and their comments will be answered.”
Communication will also be more effective because the recall candidates are “incredibly engaged in our schools,” and understand the important issues, said DeVincenzi.
Right now some parents, students and teachers fear retaliation if they speak their minds, she said.
“That culture has to stop, 100 percent,” said DeVincenzi. “We see that problem, acknowledge it, and want to change it.”
“We also need a board that will direct the district rather than allow the superintendent to direct it,” said DeVincenzi. “Superintendents are in charge of day-to-day operations, but they need some direction.”
More oversight
Given the possibility that the state will take away St. Helena’s Basic Aid status — it’s already done away with the name in favor of the ominous term “excess revenue” — the board needs to come up with a plan to do more with less.
That means looking at the district’s financial priorities, said DeVincenzi.
“I’m concerned that there are some programs that are not being funded and there are some segments of our student population that are not being served as well as they could be,” she said. “We need to ask some tough questions about where our dollars should be spent.”
DeVincenzi believes the recall was sparked in April when the board appointed Robert Haley as superintendent, instead of hiring him on an interim basis and conducting an outside search for other candidates.
“That caused a lot of parents and community members to start talking,” said DeVincenzi. “People shared the experiences and concerns that they had, and it seemed that a lot of those stories weren’t isolated experiences — they were part of a pattern.”
The recall could have been avoided if trustees had taken the community’s advice on the Haley appointment, drafted his contract differently, or even explained their position more effectively, said DeVincenzi.
“Time and time again, instead of listening to people’s questions and comments and keeping an open mind, the board has dug in and continued on its path,” she said.
DeVincenzi said that if she doesn’t win Martini’s seat, she would run for one of the three seats that are available in November 2010.
CANDIDATE PROFILE: Jeannie Kerr
By Jesse Duarte
STAFF WRITER
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Jeannie Kerr, one of four challengers running in the Feb. 23 school board recall election, says “respectful communication” is the key to restoring faith in the St. Helena School Board.
Kerr is running for the seat held by Trustee Cynthia Lane. But Kerr says she doesn’t think of the election as a contest between her and Lane.
“This is about bad choices the board has made that took money out of the hands of our students,” said Kerr. “The community has lost trust in our board members. We don’t have time to wait for the November election. We need to make positive changes now.”
Kerr has been involved with the parent groups for the primary/elementary and middle schools and the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation. She has children attending St. Helena Elementary School and RLS Middle School.
She also serves on the city’s Parks and Recreation Commission. In 2003 she spearheaded the renovation of a playground at Crane Park, leading the St. Helena Chamber of Commerce to name her “Citizen of the Year.”
Kerr said the recall can be traced back to April 9, when the board invited Assistant Superintendent Robert Haley to succeed the retiring Superintendent Allan Gordon instead of conducting an open search, as some parents urged.
“There were many, many engaged parents in that room who were very upset and frustrated with that decision,” said Kerr. “We felt that there should have been some kind of open search, and our district was at a point where we could have used new leadership.”
Kerr said the movement that would grow into the recall campaign gained momentum in May when the board, in spite of numerous public comments, letters to the editor and e-mails to trustees endorsing an open search, approved a two-year contract with Haley.
If the board had slowed down the process, hired Haley on an interim basis and conducted an open search for candidates outside the district, the recall could have been avoided, said Kerr.
Spending questioned
Instead, she said, parents’ outrage only grew when they became aware of the lucrative retirement packages offered to Gordon and retiring high school principal Jim Zoll, said Kerr.
“It saddened many of us to think that they could offer something like that and at the same time take away programs for our students,” she said.
Kerr, who has helped organize the Harvest Festival, Holiday Home Tour and Just Imagine! fundraisers, said she was particularly shocked “because I know how much time — hundreds of hours — it takes for parents to raise that kind of money for our students. To see that money go out the door without any thought was astonishing to all of us.”
Communication urged
During the entire saga, “we were trying to communicate with the board, and our voices were not being heard,” said Kerr.
That will change if the recall succeeds, she said. She said she and her fellow challengers would bring “respectful and thoughtful communication, positive leadership, and more fiscal responsibility and transparency.”
The new board would be more open-minded and do a better job listening to their constituents, said Kerr.
“I’d be able to bring people together,” she said. “I could bring our major stakeholders — administrators, principals, teachers, parents — together and provide a forum where we could openly communicate and move forward in a positive way.”
Focus on students
As far as the district’s financial situation, “anything could happen,” said Kerr. But it seems likely that the district’s budget will shrink, not grow, in future years, she said.
To prepare, the board should take a hard look at its fiscal priorities, she said.
“Right now too much of our budget is going to administrative salaries and not into our students’ hands,” said Kerr. “We need to look for ways to budget so that more financial resources are going to our students.”
The impact of the current board’s decisions about retirement incentives and administrative salares is being felt in the classroom through discontinued programs, fewer teacher’s aides and fewer books and supplies available in the classrooms and libraries, said Kerr.
In addition, parent groups are being asked to fund things the district should be handling, she said.
The district’s teachers and support staff are excellent, but Kerr is concerned that some groups of students, such as at-risk, special education and English language learners, aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve.
“I feel very strongly that every single child in our district should get the resources they deserve,” she said.
If Lane is recalled and replaced by Kerr, Kerr would serve out the remainder of Lane’s term, which expires in November 2012.
If Kerr isn’t elected to Lane’s seat, she said she’d seriously consider running again.
STAFF WRITER
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Jeannie Kerr, one of four challengers running in the Feb. 23 school board recall election, says “respectful communication” is the key to restoring faith in the St. Helena School Board.
Kerr is running for the seat held by Trustee Cynthia Lane. But Kerr says she doesn’t think of the election as a contest between her and Lane.
“This is about bad choices the board has made that took money out of the hands of our students,” said Kerr. “The community has lost trust in our board members. We don’t have time to wait for the November election. We need to make positive changes now.”
Kerr has been involved with the parent groups for the primary/elementary and middle schools and the St. Helena Public Schools Foundation. She has children attending St. Helena Elementary School and RLS Middle School.
She also serves on the city’s Parks and Recreation Commission. In 2003 she spearheaded the renovation of a playground at Crane Park, leading the St. Helena Chamber of Commerce to name her “Citizen of the Year.”
Kerr said the recall can be traced back to April 9, when the board invited Assistant Superintendent Robert Haley to succeed the retiring Superintendent Allan Gordon instead of conducting an open search, as some parents urged.
“There were many, many engaged parents in that room who were very upset and frustrated with that decision,” said Kerr. “We felt that there should have been some kind of open search, and our district was at a point where we could have used new leadership.”
Kerr said the movement that would grow into the recall campaign gained momentum in May when the board, in spite of numerous public comments, letters to the editor and e-mails to trustees endorsing an open search, approved a two-year contract with Haley.
If the board had slowed down the process, hired Haley on an interim basis and conducted an open search for candidates outside the district, the recall could have been avoided, said Kerr.
Spending questioned
Instead, she said, parents’ outrage only grew when they became aware of the lucrative retirement packages offered to Gordon and retiring high school principal Jim Zoll, said Kerr.
“It saddened many of us to think that they could offer something like that and at the same time take away programs for our students,” she said.
Kerr, who has helped organize the Harvest Festival, Holiday Home Tour and Just Imagine! fundraisers, said she was particularly shocked “because I know how much time — hundreds of hours — it takes for parents to raise that kind of money for our students. To see that money go out the door without any thought was astonishing to all of us.”
Communication urged
During the entire saga, “we were trying to communicate with the board, and our voices were not being heard,” said Kerr.
That will change if the recall succeeds, she said. She said she and her fellow challengers would bring “respectful and thoughtful communication, positive leadership, and more fiscal responsibility and transparency.”
The new board would be more open-minded and do a better job listening to their constituents, said Kerr.
“I’d be able to bring people together,” she said. “I could bring our major stakeholders — administrators, principals, teachers, parents — together and provide a forum where we could openly communicate and move forward in a positive way.”
Focus on students
As far as the district’s financial situation, “anything could happen,” said Kerr. But it seems likely that the district’s budget will shrink, not grow, in future years, she said.
To prepare, the board should take a hard look at its fiscal priorities, she said.
“Right now too much of our budget is going to administrative salaries and not into our students’ hands,” said Kerr. “We need to look for ways to budget so that more financial resources are going to our students.”
The impact of the current board’s decisions about retirement incentives and administrative salares is being felt in the classroom through discontinued programs, fewer teacher’s aides and fewer books and supplies available in the classrooms and libraries, said Kerr.
In addition, parent groups are being asked to fund things the district should be handling, she said.
The district’s teachers and support staff are excellent, but Kerr is concerned that some groups of students, such as at-risk, special education and English language learners, aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve.
“I feel very strongly that every single child in our district should get the resources they deserve,” she said.
If Lane is recalled and replaced by Kerr, Kerr would serve out the remainder of Lane’s term, which expires in November 2012.
If Kerr isn’t elected to Lane’s seat, she said she’d seriously consider running again.
CANDIDATE PROFILE: Sean Maher
By Jesse Duarte
STAFF WRITER
Sunday, January 03, 2010
Sean Maher helped raise more than $7 million for the Boys & Girls Club’s Tainter Street facility, so he’s pretty sure he can help the St. Helena School Board keep track of its finances.
As board president from 2004 to 2006, Maher along with Andy Beckstoffer led the capital campaign that financed the Boys & Girls Club’s Tainter Street facility, which today serves 800 kids.
Following a roughly five-year exploratory phase and a two-year fundraising drive, Maher and the rest of the Boys & Girls Club board reduce the size of the proposed building in response to neighbors’ concerns.
Maher, who’s seeking the school board seat held by Trustee Ines DeLuna in the Feb. 23 recall election, said he would apply that same spirit of listening and cooperation to the school board.
If the recall succeeds, people can expect the board to be more receptive to input “and listen to the parents, who we work for,” said Maher.
As a founding partner with Maher and Associates, Maher assists wine-related businesses with long-term planning and asset management. He’s also coached youth baseball, basketball and soccer, and still sits on the Boys & Girls Club board.
Maher’s family moved to St. Helena in the mid-1970s. He moved away to attend college, but came back to raise a family.
“We live in a very special part of the world, and I want to make sure it stays that way,” he said. “I’m committed to doing anything I can to improve it.”
Maher’s two children attend St. Helena primary and elementary schools. “I’d like to make sure that my kids, and all kids, have every opportunity to do their best,” he said.
This year Maher managed the school board campaign of Kevin Alfaro, a pro-recall candidate who won two-thirds of the vote and took over Jim Haslip’s old seat.
Maher said the recall was mounted because of the board’s lack of communication, particularly when they hired then-Assistant Superintendent Robert Haley to replace the retiring Superintendent Allan Gordon over the objections of many parents.
“Like a lot of people, I feel that process was flawed,” said Maher, adding there’s “a reasonable chance” the recall could have been avoided if the board had hired Haley on an interim basis and conducted a search for other candidates.
Maher also questions the board’s fiscal priorities. As the state’s financial situation deteriorates, the district could face tough times, especially if it loses its Basic Aid status, said Maher.
“In future budgets we’re going to have to look hard at expenses and having an appropriate reserve,” he said. “I see some tough years ahead of us, and we need to be sure we’re spending money in the right places.”
Giving expensive retirement packages to Gordon and former high school Principal Jim Zoll was an example of poor financial decision-making, said Maher.
“I have no problem paying for experience and talent,” he said. “But I question giving out excessive packages when you hear about the need for more elementary school aides and after-school tutoring.”
As far as curriculum is concerned, Maher is worried about the district’s special education students. Several lawsuits are pending, at substantial cost to the district, and “that whole situation needs to be reviewed,” he said.
“I’m concerned that there might be a culture of threats and lawsuits,” said Maher, referring specifically to a now-resolved dispute with neighboring school districts involving special ed funding.
“I’m not sure it was prudent to spend all that to get money that it appears to me we would have gotten eventually anyway — and we probably would have gotten it quicker,” he said.
Maher said that if he doesn’t win DeLuna’s seat, he’d run again in a future election.
STAFF WRITER
Sunday, January 03, 2010
Sean Maher helped raise more than $7 million for the Boys & Girls Club’s Tainter Street facility, so he’s pretty sure he can help the St. Helena School Board keep track of its finances.
As board president from 2004 to 2006, Maher along with Andy Beckstoffer led the capital campaign that financed the Boys & Girls Club’s Tainter Street facility, which today serves 800 kids.
Following a roughly five-year exploratory phase and a two-year fundraising drive, Maher and the rest of the Boys & Girls Club board reduce the size of the proposed building in response to neighbors’ concerns.
Maher, who’s seeking the school board seat held by Trustee Ines DeLuna in the Feb. 23 recall election, said he would apply that same spirit of listening and cooperation to the school board.
If the recall succeeds, people can expect the board to be more receptive to input “and listen to the parents, who we work for,” said Maher.
As a founding partner with Maher and Associates, Maher assists wine-related businesses with long-term planning and asset management. He’s also coached youth baseball, basketball and soccer, and still sits on the Boys & Girls Club board.
Maher’s family moved to St. Helena in the mid-1970s. He moved away to attend college, but came back to raise a family.
“We live in a very special part of the world, and I want to make sure it stays that way,” he said. “I’m committed to doing anything I can to improve it.”
Maher’s two children attend St. Helena primary and elementary schools. “I’d like to make sure that my kids, and all kids, have every opportunity to do their best,” he said.
This year Maher managed the school board campaign of Kevin Alfaro, a pro-recall candidate who won two-thirds of the vote and took over Jim Haslip’s old seat.
Maher said the recall was mounted because of the board’s lack of communication, particularly when they hired then-Assistant Superintendent Robert Haley to replace the retiring Superintendent Allan Gordon over the objections of many parents.
“Like a lot of people, I feel that process was flawed,” said Maher, adding there’s “a reasonable chance” the recall could have been avoided if the board had hired Haley on an interim basis and conducted a search for other candidates.
Maher also questions the board’s fiscal priorities. As the state’s financial situation deteriorates, the district could face tough times, especially if it loses its Basic Aid status, said Maher.
“In future budgets we’re going to have to look hard at expenses and having an appropriate reserve,” he said. “I see some tough years ahead of us, and we need to be sure we’re spending money in the right places.”
Giving expensive retirement packages to Gordon and former high school Principal Jim Zoll was an example of poor financial decision-making, said Maher.
“I have no problem paying for experience and talent,” he said. “But I question giving out excessive packages when you hear about the need for more elementary school aides and after-school tutoring.”
As far as curriculum is concerned, Maher is worried about the district’s special education students. Several lawsuits are pending, at substantial cost to the district, and “that whole situation needs to be reviewed,” he said.
“I’m concerned that there might be a culture of threats and lawsuits,” said Maher, referring specifically to a now-resolved dispute with neighboring school districts involving special ed funding.
“I’m not sure it was prudent to spend all that to get money that it appears to me we would have gotten eventually anyway — and we probably would have gotten it quicker,” he said.
Maher said that if he doesn’t win DeLuna’s seat, he’d run again in a future election.
Parent Feedback on Special Education Audit
The article in last week’s Star, "Audit Praises Special Ed Programs at SHUSD", said in reference to moderate to severely disabled students at the high school: “…mainstreaming of special ed students at St Helena High School has angered some parents.” That is incorrect. Indeed, the special ed students at the high school have always been included in classes appropriate for them with proper material and staff support. What “angered” me about the new program was that my son was in classes that were not appropriate for his level of learning, the district did not supply materials to adapt the curriculum, and he frequently attended class without the required aide. That is not mainstreaming.
In her full report, Dr Parker gives kudos to the new special ed staff who are building a great program at the high school. I am happy they are restoring a solid program this school year, because the first year of the new program was a complete failure. But I want to point out that much of what they are doing now is similar to the old program that they dismantled in 2008-09. For instance, this year the staff has forged a relationship with the Napa Unified Transition Program in order to develop their own (for moderate/severely disabled students aged 18-22). The Napa program is similar to the former St Helena program before 2008-09. Since Dr Parker was not able to observe the former program, there is no way she can compare the two and conclude that the new program is better.
But the real problem lies in how the administration handled this change and the board’s reaction to parents’ concerns. The district did not inform parents the former program was being dropped. We were ignored, criticized, and often met with hostility. When concerned parents approached the board in August 2008, we were shocked at their lack of response. And, our concerns at the time about the new program were realized -- it was nothing short of a disaster. So, the crux of the problem is not special ed per se. It is that the district is capable of making decisions detrimental to students’ education and treating parents with disrespect, and the board (excluding new trustee Alfaro) blindly supports those decisions.
Kelly Rios
St. Helena, CA
In her full report, Dr Parker gives kudos to the new special ed staff who are building a great program at the high school. I am happy they are restoring a solid program this school year, because the first year of the new program was a complete failure. But I want to point out that much of what they are doing now is similar to the old program that they dismantled in 2008-09. For instance, this year the staff has forged a relationship with the Napa Unified Transition Program in order to develop their own (for moderate/severely disabled students aged 18-22). The Napa program is similar to the former St Helena program before 2008-09. Since Dr Parker was not able to observe the former program, there is no way she can compare the two and conclude that the new program is better.
But the real problem lies in how the administration handled this change and the board’s reaction to parents’ concerns. The district did not inform parents the former program was being dropped. We were ignored, criticized, and often met with hostility. When concerned parents approached the board in August 2008, we were shocked at their lack of response. And, our concerns at the time about the new program were realized -- it was nothing short of a disaster. So, the crux of the problem is not special ed per se. It is that the district is capable of making decisions detrimental to students’ education and treating parents with disrespect, and the board (excluding new trustee Alfaro) blindly supports those decisions.
Kelly Rios
St. Helena, CA
Monday, December 28, 2009
Dear Friends,
We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of you who have supported the campaign to recall Cindy Warren, Cynthia Lane, Ines DeLuna and Carolyn Martini as members of the St. Helena Unified School District Board of Trustees. We were tremendously successful this summer in collecting petition signatures, and now the recall election is set for February 23, 2010. The voters now have the opportunity to decide whether change is needed with respect to how our school district is operated and managed. While we have accomplished so much already, there is still a lot of work to be done until the election, and there are many ways in which you can help, including:
· Speaking with friends, neighbors and acquaintances about the recall and encouraging them to vote yes on the recall when ballots are mailed out;
· Writing a letter to the St. Helena Star and/or Napa Register in support of the recall;
· Encouraging others to join our published supporter list;
· Donating money to help fund lawn signs, flyers, ads, etc. Donations may be mailed to: Citizens for Quality Education, 1241 Adams St. #1010, St. Helena, CA, 94574 ;
· Agreeing to place a Yes On Recall sign in your yard or at your business; and
· Volunteering to hand out flyers and/or make phone calls to voters encouraging them to vote yes on the recall.
If you are interested in doing any of the above, please contact Citizens for Quality Education at Citizens4qualityed@gmail.com. Again, we sincerely thank you and look forward to your continued support.
Sincerely,
Citizens For Quality Education
1241 Adams St. #1010
St Helena, CA 94574
Email: Citizens4qualityed@gmail.com
Website: http://citizensforqualityed.blogspot.com/
We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of you who have supported the campaign to recall Cindy Warren, Cynthia Lane, Ines DeLuna and Carolyn Martini as members of the St. Helena Unified School District Board of Trustees. We were tremendously successful this summer in collecting petition signatures, and now the recall election is set for February 23, 2010. The voters now have the opportunity to decide whether change is needed with respect to how our school district is operated and managed. While we have accomplished so much already, there is still a lot of work to be done until the election, and there are many ways in which you can help, including:
· Speaking with friends, neighbors and acquaintances about the recall and encouraging them to vote yes on the recall when ballots are mailed out;
· Writing a letter to the St. Helena Star and/or Napa Register in support of the recall;
· Encouraging others to join our published supporter list;
· Donating money to help fund lawn signs, flyers, ads, etc. Donations may be mailed to: Citizens for Quality Education, 1241 Adams St. #1010, St. Helena, CA, 94574 ;
· Agreeing to place a Yes On Recall sign in your yard or at your business; and
· Volunteering to hand out flyers and/or make phone calls to voters encouraging them to vote yes on the recall.
If you are interested in doing any of the above, please contact Citizens for Quality Education at Citizens4qualityed@gmail.com. Again, we sincerely thank you and look forward to your continued support.
Sincerely,
Citizens For Quality Education
1241 Adams St. #1010
St Helena, CA 94574
Email: Citizens4qualityed@gmail.com
Website: http://citizensforqualityed.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
What The Recall Is Really About
By Jim Haslip
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
The “recallers” and I have been misrepresented by recent commentaries and letters. Forty registered voters wrote the following charges that were printed on the petition to recall the board:
• “you demonstrated a complete lack of fiscal responsibility, as evidenced by your approval of exorbitant salaries to administrative personnel and the perpetuation of unnecessary administrative positions while funds for instructional materials to be used for our schools are being cut due to the current economic crisis;
• “ you failed to act with transparency and failed to provide the public with clear and accurate information and you, in some instances, misled the public with respect to financial, academic, and administrative matters;
• “you failed to work with the public as your administrative policies require and you completely disregarded all of the input that the public has provided to you;
• “you failed to adequately and properly supervise administrative staff, including, but not limited to, the Superintendent;
• “you allowed the administration to grossly mismanage fundamental school programs, such as special education and vocational programs...”
The exorbitant salaries are well-documented. The highest superintendent salary for a district of our size or smaller was cited by district supporters as $160,000 in Kentfield (other districts cited are up to three times larger than ours). Gordon retired at $264,000. Haley is making $205,000 base salary. (The district claims he makes $189,000, an exorbitant amount for someone who was subject to an extremely rare “vote of no confidence” at his last district, but they fail to disclose another $16,000 that he receives “on payroll” for “expenses.”)
I estimate that if (former Superintendent Allan) Gordon had been paid at the same rate as the Kentfield superintendent, without his retirement gift (however “legal” it may be), the children of St. Helena would have had access to over $650,000 for supplies, materials, and programs that have been cut. This is what “exorbitant salaries” means. This is what “misleading the public” implies.
Research by many sources, including former trustee Bill Swanson, shows that we overspend on administration by no less that $900,000 year in and year out when compared to other districts of similar size and income. A former superintendent here publicly stated that when he was superintendent (and we had more students), he had four people in the district office and now there are many, many more. This is what “the perpetuation of unnecessary administrative positions” means.
Research shows that 14 programs have been reduced or eliminated in recent years. The last teacher with a Vocational Education credential was two years ago. I am happy that agricultural studies is doing well but what about all those other students that are not going to college? This is what “mismanagement of vocational education” means.
The district had spent under $30,000 a year on legal fees. It is over $700,000 over the last 3 years. Meanwhile, we continue to sue the County rather than cooperate with them on special education, vocational programs, group purchasing, and staff development. This is what “lack of fiscal responsibility” means. We blame this on the County and on a few special education parents when competent administrators have demonstrated elsewhere that cooperation is more fiscally responsible that confrontation.
The recall is not about my term on the board or a few “recallers.” It is about our children and how your tax dollars are spent. I did not leave the Board to run away. Rather I have chosen the side of our children. When the Recall vote is taken in February, please join us.
(Jim Haslip is a former trustee of the St. Helena Unified School District. He lives in St. Helena.)
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
The “recallers” and I have been misrepresented by recent commentaries and letters. Forty registered voters wrote the following charges that were printed on the petition to recall the board:
• “you demonstrated a complete lack of fiscal responsibility, as evidenced by your approval of exorbitant salaries to administrative personnel and the perpetuation of unnecessary administrative positions while funds for instructional materials to be used for our schools are being cut due to the current economic crisis;
• “ you failed to act with transparency and failed to provide the public with clear and accurate information and you, in some instances, misled the public with respect to financial, academic, and administrative matters;
• “you failed to work with the public as your administrative policies require and you completely disregarded all of the input that the public has provided to you;
• “you failed to adequately and properly supervise administrative staff, including, but not limited to, the Superintendent;
• “you allowed the administration to grossly mismanage fundamental school programs, such as special education and vocational programs...”
The exorbitant salaries are well-documented. The highest superintendent salary for a district of our size or smaller was cited by district supporters as $160,000 in Kentfield (other districts cited are up to three times larger than ours). Gordon retired at $264,000. Haley is making $205,000 base salary. (The district claims he makes $189,000, an exorbitant amount for someone who was subject to an extremely rare “vote of no confidence” at his last district, but they fail to disclose another $16,000 that he receives “on payroll” for “expenses.”)
I estimate that if (former Superintendent Allan) Gordon had been paid at the same rate as the Kentfield superintendent, without his retirement gift (however “legal” it may be), the children of St. Helena would have had access to over $650,000 for supplies, materials, and programs that have been cut. This is what “exorbitant salaries” means. This is what “misleading the public” implies.
Research by many sources, including former trustee Bill Swanson, shows that we overspend on administration by no less that $900,000 year in and year out when compared to other districts of similar size and income. A former superintendent here publicly stated that when he was superintendent (and we had more students), he had four people in the district office and now there are many, many more. This is what “the perpetuation of unnecessary administrative positions” means.
Research shows that 14 programs have been reduced or eliminated in recent years. The last teacher with a Vocational Education credential was two years ago. I am happy that agricultural studies is doing well but what about all those other students that are not going to college? This is what “mismanagement of vocational education” means.
The district had spent under $30,000 a year on legal fees. It is over $700,000 over the last 3 years. Meanwhile, we continue to sue the County rather than cooperate with them on special education, vocational programs, group purchasing, and staff development. This is what “lack of fiscal responsibility” means. We blame this on the County and on a few special education parents when competent administrators have demonstrated elsewhere that cooperation is more fiscally responsible that confrontation.
The recall is not about my term on the board or a few “recallers.” It is about our children and how your tax dollars are spent. I did not leave the Board to run away. Rather I have chosen the side of our children. When the Recall vote is taken in February, please join us.
(Jim Haslip is a former trustee of the St. Helena Unified School District. He lives in St. Helena.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)